Federal Agencies Clarify Pathways for Fertility Benefits Offered by Employers
The Departments issued the FAQs in response to a February 2025 Presidential Executive Order (EO 14216), which directs the Assistant to the President for the Domestic Policy Council to submit policy recommendations to protect access to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and aggressively reduce out-of-pocket and health plan costs for IVF treatment.
SECURE Act 2.0: IRS Issues Final Regulations on Catch-Up Contributions
Recent IRS regulations under the SECURE 2.0 Act significantly affect retirement plan catch-up contributions. Learn about the new Roth rules, “super” catch-up limits and key compliance deadlines for plan sponsors.
When preparing for an archeological dig, New Hampshire state archeologist Richard Boisvert once succinctly stated: “If we knew what was there, we wouldn’thave to dig.”
Vanessa Tiradentes, a member of Gould & Ratner’s Litigation Practice, contributed a chapter in the book, Litigating the Business Divorce. Her chapter focused on challenging a stock split in the business divorce context. Among other issues, the chapter discusses various manners and methodsby which a minority owner may challenge a split, as well as the various forms of relief that may be available.
McDonald’s and the National Labor Relations Board faced off in an administrative court to determine whether the fast-food chain is liable for theactions of its franchisees as a joint employer.
Most construction contracts contain boilerplate Force Majeure or Act of God provisions, but they should clearly identify what those events are, their impacton contract terms and allocate the risks of delay caused by them.
At the start of this year, a new provision of the Illinois Mechanics Lien Act became effective, a major development in the history of Illinois’ MechanicsLien Act that may simplify the sale or refinancing of real estate that would otherwise be encumbered by mechanic’s lien litigation.
Litigation over restrictive covenant agreements, including non-competes, is on the rise. Because such agreements are viewed as restraints on trade, theyare generally disfavored by Illinois courts. In a recent decision, an Illinois appellate court followed suit, striking down as overbroad and unreasonablethe non-compete, non-solicit and confidentiality provisions in an employment agreement.
David
Michael
Managing Partner
Chair, Human Resources and Employment Law Practice